Skip to content

Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology vs George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology: who pays more?

Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology had 797 people on the 2025 Sunshine List with a median of $128,465, George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology 804 with a median of $135,910 — that is 6% more at the median for George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology, and George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology lists 1× as many people.

On the list

Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology
797
George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology
804

employees paid $100K+, 2025

Median salary

Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology
$128,465
George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology
$135,910

salary paid, 2025

Average salary

Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology
$129,801
George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology
$132,764

salary paid, 2025

Listed payroll

Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology
$103.6M
George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology
$108.4M

total compensation, 2025

Median salary by year
19962025

  • Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology
  • George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology
Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology and George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology, 1996–2025Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology: $108,660 in 1999 to $128,465 in 2025. George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology: $116,054 in 1999 to $135,910 in 2025.$0$50K$100K$150K1996200620162025

Median salary paid on each employer’s Sunshine List filing. A gap is a year the employer filed nobody under this name.

Year by year

Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology and George Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology by year: people on the Sunshine List and median salary
YearAlgonquin College of Applied Arts and TechnologyGeorge Brown College of Applied Arts and Technology
PeopleMedianPeopleMedian
2025797$128,465804$135,910
2024795$124,580822$126,131
2023741$124,785738$126,222
2022597$117,071609$116,604
2021571$115,378598$114,896
2020516$113,655572$113,184
2019468$111,443559$111,408
2018484$110,604536$110,076
2017167$114,494153$115,613
2016375$106,195413$104,788
2015369$107,920372$104,002
2014267$106,180420$107,441
2013253$104,893320$103,016
2012250$104,790294$102,197
2011223$103,485266$101,437
2010128$104,556132$107,799
200997$109,90893$112,942
200872$120,97577$113,933
200754$121,82647$115,837
200649$118,03439$113,984
200537$114,23932$110,143
200435$111,81330$111,632
200320$106,29722$118,848
200214$106,58211$116,077
20017$112,2288$110,952
20007$114,0696$114,899
19996$108,6606$116,054
1998<5<5<5<5
1996<5<5<5<5

Related questions

Method. Medians and averages are salary paid; listed payroll is total compensation (salary plus taxable benefits), as filed. Both sides come from the same Ontario Sunshine List, which covers only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more — so this compares the shape of each employer’s six-figure payroll, not its whole workforce, and an employer with more low-paid staff simply lists fewer of them. A side with fewer than five people keeps its count but shows “<5” instead of a median, average or payroll figure, since any of those would be that handful of people’s own numbers. Sector: Colleges. Data runs through 2025.