Skip to content

Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology vs Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology: who pays more?

Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology had 234 people on the 2025 Sunshine List with a median of $128,018, Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology 250 with a median of $132,188 — Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology pays its listed staff 3% more at the median, and Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology lists 1.1× as many people.

On the list

Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology
234
Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
250

employees paid $100K+, 2025

Median salary

Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology
$128,018
Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
$132,188

salary paid, 2025

Average salary

Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology
$131,324
Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
$132,740

salary paid, 2025

Listed payroll

Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology
$30.8M
Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
$33.2M

total compensation, 2025

Median salary by year
19962025

  • Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology
  • Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology and Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology, 1996–2025Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology: $118,309 in 2002 to $128,018 in 2025. Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology: $114,043 in 2001 to $132,188 in 2025.$0$50K$100K$150K1996200620162025

Median salary paid on each employer’s Sunshine List filing. A gap is a year the employer filed nobody under this name.

Year by year

Cambrian College of Applied Arts and Technology and Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology by year: people on the Sunshine List and median salary
YearCambrian College of Applied Arts and TechnologySir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
PeopleMedianPeopleMedian
2025234$128,018250$132,188
2024224$121,994281$126,650
2023205$124,238269$126,472
2022173$116,623231$116,823
2021164$114,936222$115,671
2020160$113,219221$118,049
2019147$111,015191$111,400
2018142$110,683189$110,495
201759$110,98259$117,030
2016115$107,748152$106,068
201591$109,715129$104,978
2014131$108,675122$106,166
201399$106,376113$103,186
201296$104,952111$103,123
201194$103,480109$102,935
201064$103,84471$105,152
200947$106,582109$103,491
200835$108,86434$111,850
200718$108,94929$111,674
200614$106,45221$118,192
200512$109,70623$114,072
200410$113,18114$116,000
20036$113,99913$113,191
20026$118,3098$110,925
2001<5<55$114,043
2000<5<5<5<5
1999<5<5<5<5
1998<5<5
1996<5<5

Related questions

Method. Medians and averages are salary paid; listed payroll is total compensation (salary plus taxable benefits), as filed. Both sides come from the same Ontario Sunshine List, which covers only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more — so this compares the shape of each employer’s six-figure payroll, not its whole workforce, and an employer with more low-paid staff simply lists fewer of them. A side with fewer than five people keeps its count but shows “<5” instead of a median, average or payroll figure, since any of those would be that handful of people’s own numbers. Sector: Colleges. Data runs through 2025.