Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine vs Municipal Property Assessment Corporation: who pays more?
Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine last filed fewer than five employees in 2015 (too few to publish a median); Municipal Property Assessment Corporation filed 594 in 2025 with a median of $115,178 — too few people at Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine to compare medians. The two are compared at their own latest filings.
Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine last filed in 2015, so the two sides below are each shown at their own most recent filing.
On the list
- Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine
- <5
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- 594
employees paid $100K+, each at its latest year
Median salary
- Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine
- <5
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $115,178
salary paid, each at its latest year
Average salary
- Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine
- <5
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $128,620
salary paid, each at its latest year
Listed payroll
- Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine
- <5
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $76.6M
total compensation, each at its latest year
Median salary by year
2002–2025
- Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
Median salary paid on each employer’s Sunshine List filing. A gap is a year the employer filed nobody under this name.
Year by year
| Year | Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine | Municipal Property Assessment Corporation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People | Median | People | Median | |
| 2025 | — | — | 594 | $115,178 |
| 2024 | — | — | 502 | $114,472 |
| 2023 | — | — | 366 | $118,420 |
| 2022 | — | — | 314 | $114,583 |
| 2021 | — | — | 274 | $116,001 |
| 2020 | — | — | 297 | $117,011 |
| 2019 | — | — | 228 | $117,859 |
| 2018 | — | — | 234 | $116,119 |
| 2017 | — | — | 240 | $117,491 |
| 2016 | — | — | 405 | $112,920 |
| 2015 | <5 | <5 | 207 | $110,762 |
| 2014 | <5 | <5 | 172 | $110,256 |
| 2013 | 6 | $120,383 | 143 | $109,266 |
| 2012 | — | — | 104 | $106,485 |
| 2011 | — | — | 94 | $108,327 |
| 2010 | — | — | 80 | $110,106 |
| 2009 | — | — | 74 | $112,032 |
| 2008 | — | — | 49 | $114,041 |
| 2007 | — | — | 40 | $110,447 |
| 2006 | — | — | 32 | $111,635 |
| 2005 | — | — | 27 | $109,879 |
| 2004 | — | — | 17 | $113,859 |
| 2003 | — | — | 13 | $110,175 |
| 2002 | — | — | 13 | $115,364 |
Related questions
- Who makes the most at Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine? →
- Who makes the most at Municipal Property Assessment Corporation? →
- How many Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine employees earn over $150,000? →
- How many Municipal Property Assessment Corporation employees earn over $150,000? →
- Centre for Commercialization of Regenerative Medicine vs ORNGE: who pays more? →
- Who makes the most in Other Public Sector Employers? →
Method. Medians and averages are salary paid; listed payroll is total compensation (salary plus taxable benefits), as filed. Both sides come from the same Ontario Sunshine List, which covers only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more — so this compares the shape of each employer’s six-figure payroll, not its whole workforce, and an employer with more low-paid staff simply lists fewer of them. A side with fewer than five people keeps its count but shows “<5” instead of a median, average or payroll figure, since any of those would be that handful of people’s own numbers. Sector: Other Public Sector Employers. Data runs through 2025.