Skip to content

ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) vs Municipal Property Assessment Corporation: who pays more?

In 2025 ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) listed 104 employees with a median of $124,580; Municipal Property Assessment Corporation listed 594 with a median of $115,178 — ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) pays its listed staff 8% more at the median, and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation lists 5.7× as many people.

On the list

ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
104
Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
594

employees paid $100K+, 2025

Median salary

ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
$124,580
Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
$115,178

salary paid, 2025

Average salary

ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
$138,419
Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
$128,620

salary paid, 2025

Listed payroll

ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
$14.6M
Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
$76.6M

total compensation, 2025

Median salary by year
19982025

  • ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
  • Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, 1998–2025ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences): $137,898 in 2005 to $124,580 in 2025. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation: $115,364 in 2002 to $115,178 in 2025.$0$50K$100K$150K$200K1998200820172025

Median salary paid on each employer’s Sunshine List filing. A gap is a year the employer filed nobody under this name.

Year by year

ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation by year: people on the Sunshine List and median salary
YearICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
PeopleMedianPeopleMedian
2025104$124,580594$115,178
202485$121,232502$114,472
202373$119,254366$118,420
202261$118,946314$114,583
202159$119,306274$116,001
202057$119,760297$117,011
201945$116,827228$117,859
201835$115,365234$116,119
201733$112,132240$117,491
201630$112,805405$112,920
201523$131,887207$110,762
201418$137,783172$110,256
201318$133,644143$109,266
2012104$106,485
201116$138,78094$108,327
201017$147,88680$110,106
200915$144,82974$112,032
200814$150,38349$114,041
200711$139,52140$110,447
200611$129,50632$111,635
20058$137,89827$109,879
200417$113,859
200313$110,175
200213$115,364
1999<5<5
1998<5<5

Related questions

Method. Medians and averages are salary paid; listed payroll is total compensation (salary plus taxable benefits), as filed. Both sides come from the same Ontario Sunshine List, which covers only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more — so this compares the shape of each employer’s six-figure payroll, not its whole workforce, and an employer with more low-paid staff simply lists fewer of them. A side with fewer than five people keeps its count but shows “<5” instead of a median, average or payroll figure, since any of those would be that handful of people’s own numbers. Sector: Other Public Sector Employers. Data runs through 2025.