ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) vs Municipal Property Assessment Corporation: who pays more?
In 2025 ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) listed 104 employees with a median of $124,580; Municipal Property Assessment Corporation listed 594 with a median of $115,178 — ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) pays its listed staff 8% more at the median, and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation lists 5.7× as many people.
On the list
- ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
- 104
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- 594
employees paid $100K+, 2025
Median salary
- ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
- $124,580
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $115,178
salary paid, 2025
Average salary
- ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
- $138,419
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $128,620
salary paid, 2025
Listed payroll
- ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
- $14.6M
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $76.6M
total compensation, 2025
Median salary by year
1998–2025
- ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
Median salary paid on each employer’s Sunshine List filing. A gap is a year the employer filed nobody under this name.
Year by year
| Year | ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) | Municipal Property Assessment Corporation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People | Median | People | Median | |
| 2025 | 104 | $124,580 | 594 | $115,178 |
| 2024 | 85 | $121,232 | 502 | $114,472 |
| 2023 | 73 | $119,254 | 366 | $118,420 |
| 2022 | 61 | $118,946 | 314 | $114,583 |
| 2021 | 59 | $119,306 | 274 | $116,001 |
| 2020 | 57 | $119,760 | 297 | $117,011 |
| 2019 | 45 | $116,827 | 228 | $117,859 |
| 2018 | 35 | $115,365 | 234 | $116,119 |
| 2017 | 33 | $112,132 | 240 | $117,491 |
| 2016 | 30 | $112,805 | 405 | $112,920 |
| 2015 | 23 | $131,887 | 207 | $110,762 |
| 2014 | 18 | $137,783 | 172 | $110,256 |
| 2013 | 18 | $133,644 | 143 | $109,266 |
| 2012 | — | — | 104 | $106,485 |
| 2011 | 16 | $138,780 | 94 | $108,327 |
| 2010 | 17 | $147,886 | 80 | $110,106 |
| 2009 | 15 | $144,829 | 74 | $112,032 |
| 2008 | 14 | $150,383 | 49 | $114,041 |
| 2007 | 11 | $139,521 | 40 | $110,447 |
| 2006 | 11 | $129,506 | 32 | $111,635 |
| 2005 | 8 | $137,898 | 27 | $109,879 |
| 2004 | — | — | 17 | $113,859 |
| 2003 | — | — | 13 | $110,175 |
| 2002 | — | — | 13 | $115,364 |
| 1999 | <5 | <5 | — | — |
| 1998 | <5 | <5 | — | — |
Related questions
- Who makes the most at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences)? →
- Who makes the most at Municipal Property Assessment Corporation? →
- How many ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) employees earn over $150,000? →
- How many Municipal Property Assessment Corporation employees earn over $150,000? →
- ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) vs ORNGE: who pays more? →
- Who makes the most in Other Public Sector Employers? →
Method. Medians and averages are salary paid; listed payroll is total compensation (salary plus taxable benefits), as filed. Both sides come from the same Ontario Sunshine List, which covers only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more — so this compares the shape of each employer’s six-figure payroll, not its whole workforce, and an employer with more low-paid staff simply lists fewer of them. A side with fewer than five people keeps its count but shows “<5” instead of a median, average or payroll figure, since any of those would be that handful of people’s own numbers. Sector: Other Public Sector Employers. Data runs through 2025.