Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund vs Municipal Property Assessment Corporation: who pays more?
Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund last filed 23 employees in 2024 with a median of $139,564; Municipal Property Assessment Corporation filed 594 in 2025 with a median of $115,178 — Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund (2024) pays its listed staff 21% more at the median, and Municipal Property Assessment Corporation lists 26× as many people. The two are compared at their own latest filings.
Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund last filed in 2024, so the two sides below are each shown at their own most recent filing.
Ask another question
On the list
- Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund
- 23
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- 594
employees paid $100K+, each at its latest year
Median salary
- Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund
- $139,564
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $115,178
salary paid, each at its latest year
Average salary
- Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund
- $155,573
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $128,620
salary paid, each at its latest year
Listed payroll
- Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund
- $3.9M
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
- $76.6M
total compensation, each at its latest year
Median salary by year
2002–2025
- Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund
- Municipal Property Assessment Corporation
Median salary paid on each employer’s Sunshine List filing. A gap is a year the employer filed nobody under this name.
Year by year
| Year | Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund | Municipal Property Assessment Corporation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People | Median | People | Median | |
| 2025 | — | — | 594 | $115,178 |
| 2024 | 23 | $139,564 | 502 | $114,472 |
| 2023 | 22 | $140,997 | 366 | $118,420 |
| 2022 | — | — | 314 | $114,583 |
| 2021 | — | — | 274 | $116,001 |
| 2020 | — | — | 297 | $117,011 |
| 2019 | — | — | 228 | $117,859 |
| 2018 | — | — | 234 | $116,119 |
| 2017 | — | — | 240 | $117,491 |
| 2016 | — | — | 405 | $112,920 |
| 2015 | — | — | 207 | $110,762 |
| 2014 | — | — | 172 | $110,256 |
| 2013 | — | — | 143 | $109,266 |
| 2012 | — | — | 104 | $106,485 |
| 2011 | — | — | 94 | $108,327 |
| 2010 | — | — | 80 | $110,106 |
| 2009 | — | — | 74 | $112,032 |
| 2008 | — | — | 49 | $114,041 |
| 2007 | — | — | 40 | $110,447 |
| 2006 | — | — | 32 | $111,635 |
| 2005 | — | — | 27 | $109,879 |
| 2004 | — | — | 17 | $113,859 |
| 2003 | — | — | 13 | $110,175 |
| 2002 | — | — | 13 | $115,364 |
Related questions
- Who makes the most at Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund? →
- Who makes the most at Municipal Property Assessment Corporation? →
- How many Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund employees earn over $150,000? →
- How many Municipal Property Assessment Corporation employees earn over $150,000? →
- Liuna Local 183 Training and Rehabilitation Fund vs ORNGE: who pays more? →
- Who makes the most in Other Public Sector Employers? →
Method. Medians and averages are salary paid; listed payroll is total compensation (salary plus taxable benefits), as filed. Both sides come from the same Ontario Sunshine List, which covers only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more — so this compares the shape of each employer’s six-figure payroll, not its whole workforce, and an employer with more low-paid staff simply lists fewer of them. A side with fewer than five people keeps its count but shows “<5” instead of a median, average or payroll figure, since any of those would be that handful of people’s own numbers. Sector: Other Public Sector Employers. Data runs through 2025. The 2025 figures were published here on .