Skip to content

Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology vs St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology: who pays more?

Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology had 250 people on the 2025 Sunshine List with a median of $132,188, St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology 263 with a median of $125,347 — that is 5% more at the median for Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology, and St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology lists 1.1× as many people.

On the list

Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
250
St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology
263

employees paid $100K+, 2025

Median salary

Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
$132,188
St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology
$125,347

salary paid, 2025

Average salary

Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
$132,740
St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology
$126,933

salary paid, 2025

Listed payroll

Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
$33.2M
St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology
$33.5M

total compensation, 2025

Median salary by year
19962025

  • Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology
  • St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology
Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology and St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology, 1996–2025Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology: $114,043 in 2001 to $132,188 in 2025. St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology: $115,013 in 2001 to $125,347 in 2025.$0$50K$100K$150K1996200620162025

Median salary paid on each employer’s Sunshine List filing. A gap is a year the employer filed nobody under this name.

Year by year

Sir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and Technology and St Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology by year: people on the Sunshine List and median salary
YearSir Sandford Fleming of Applied Arts and TechnologySt Lawrence College of Applied Arts and Technology
PeopleMedianPeopleMedian
2025250$132,188263$125,347
2024281$126,650298$121,507
2023269$126,472275$122,546
2022231$116,823215$115,275
2021222$115,671227$118,938
2020221$118,049177$113,611
2019191$111,400161$112,751
2018189$110,495143$111,004
201759$117,03047$119,843
2016152$106,068123$105,794
2015129$104,978112$105,913
2014122$106,166102$106,069
2013113$103,186101$104,882
2012111$103,12398$104,460
2011109$102,935100$103,007
201071$105,152105$104,908
2009109$103,49141$104,641
200834$111,85029$107,303
200729$111,67414$128,402
200621$118,19212$121,616
200523$114,07211$116,957
200414$116,0009$106,106
200313$113,19110$105,697
20028$110,92511$105,744
20015$114,0435$115,013
2000<5<5<5<5
1999<5<5<5<5
1998<5<5<5<5
1996<5<5

Related questions

Method. Medians and averages are salary paid; listed payroll is total compensation (salary plus taxable benefits), as filed. Both sides come from the same Ontario Sunshine List, which covers only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more — so this compares the shape of each employer’s six-figure payroll, not its whole workforce, and an employer with more low-paid staff simply lists fewer of them. A side with fewer than five people keeps its count but shows “<5” instead of a median, average or payroll figure, since any of those would be that handful of people’s own numbers. Sector: Colleges. Data runs through 2025.