What was the largest increase in disclosed pay at University of Waterloo in 2002?
University of Waterloo's largest increase in disclosed pay in 2002: $114,569 to $130,783, up 14.2%; it went to Richard Holt. 52 people had an increase in disclosed pay between 2001 and 2002, with a median increase of 4.6%.
Ask another question
Largest increase (by dollars)
$16,214Richard Holt · +14.2%
Had an increase
522001 → 2002
Median increase
+4.6%among those who had one
On the list
3112002 Sunshine List
Biggest Year-over-Year Increases
University of Waterloo · 2001 → 2002
A year-over-year increase or decrease in disclosed pay can include overtime, a retroactive payment, a vacation payout or severance, not only a change in base pay, rate, or role — the Sunshine List discloses total salary paid that year, not a pay rate. This list is ranked by the dollar increase, not by the percentage shown.
214 people were new to University of Waterloo's list in 2002; 146 who were on it in 2001 were not. See the full 2002 roster →
Related questions
- What was the largest increase in disclosed pay at University of Waterloo in 2025? →
- What was the largest increase in disclosed pay at University of Waterloo in 2024? →
- How many University of Waterloo employees earn over $150,000? →
- Who else had an increase in disclosed pay on the 2002 Sunshine List? →
- University of Toronto vs University of Waterloo: who pays more? →
- What does a Professor make at University of Waterloo? →
Method. Figures are salary paid, the same basis the year pages use for their movers sections. A mover is excluded from the raises above when their 2001 record was their first year at University of Waterloo (a partial year, such as a September hire, that a full second year then dwarfs and misreads as an outsized raise), or when their 2002 record is their very last on the Sunshine List — a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real change in pay until next year's data confirms it. This page does not list pay cuts: even the province-wide 2002 Sunshine List omits cuts for its own most recent year, since a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real cut until next year’s data arrives — that same reasoning applies to every employer, in every year, so cuts are left off this page entirely rather than showing them in some years and not others. Counts under five people show “<5”. Data runs through 2025. The 2002 figures were published here on .