Skip to content

What does a Regional Analyst make at Natural Resources and Forestry?

In 2025 the median Regional Analyst at Natural Resources and Forestry was paid $103,913 (8 people), 12% below the provincial median of $117,811 for the role. The highest-paid was $107,892.

People

8

listed as Regional Analyst in 2025

Median salary

$103,913

salary paid, 2025

Highest paid

$107,892

salary paid, 2025

vs Ontario

−$13,897

against $117,811 province-wide

Best paid in the role
Natural Resources and Forestry · 2025

#NameTitle as filedSalaryTotal
1Robert KeronRegional Analyst$107,892$108,122
2Samuel NsiahRegional Analyst$104,490$104,712
3Kamala RupakhetiRegional Analyst$104,156$104,378
4Steven VorosRegional Analyst$104,156$104,378
5Neil GrahamRegional Analyst$103,671$103,891
6Scott HoleRegional Analyst$103,671$103,891
7Glen WattRegional Analyst$103,671$103,891
8Garnet BeemerRegional Analyst$103,421$103,640

The 8 highest salaries among the 8 Natural Resources and Forestry records mapped to Regional Analyst in 2025. The full 2025 roster →

Median by year
20242025

  • At Natural Resources and Forestry
  • Ontario median for the role
At Natural Resources and Forestry and Ontario median for the role, 2024–2025At Natural Resources and Forestry: $105,445 in 2024 to $103,913 in 2025. Ontario median for the role: $105,096 in 2024 to $117,811 in 2025.$0$25K$50K$75K$100K$125K20242025

Median salary paid, Regional Analyst at Natural Resources and Forestry, against every Regional Analyst in Ontario. Years with fewer than 5 people are left blank.

Year by year

Regional Analyst at Natural Resources and Forestry by year
YearPeopleMedianHighestOntario median
20258$103,913$107,892$117,811
20248$105,445$106,310$105,096

Related questions

Method. Figures are salary paid (not salary plus taxable benefits), the basis of every median on this site, for records whose filed job title maps to Regional Analyst at Natural Resources and Forestry on the Ontario Sunshine List, which lists only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more. A year with fewer than 5 people shows “<5” for both its count and its median, since naming the exact count would narrow the median down to specific people. Data runs through 2025.