Who got the biggest raise at Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology in 2016?
Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology's biggest raise in 2016 was William Crumm's: $109,606 → $133,443, up 22%. 105 people got a raise between 2015 and 2016, with a median increase of 6%.
Biggest raise
+21.7%William Crumm
Got a raise
1052015 → 2016
Median increase
+5.5%among those who got one
On the list
2362016 Sunshine List
Biggest raises
Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology · 2015 → 2016
65 joined Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology, 13 left Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology, in 2016. See the full 2016 roster →
Related questions
- Who got the biggest raise at Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology in 2025? →
- Who got the biggest raise at Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology in 2024? →
- How many Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology employees earn over $150,000? →
- Who else got a raise on the 2016 Sunshine List? →
- Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning vs Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology: who pays more? →
- What does a Professor make at Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology? →
Method. Figures are salary paid, the same basis person_year_delta and the year page’s movers sections use. A mover is excluded from the raises above when their 2015 record was their first year at Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology (a partial year, such as a September hire, that a full second year then dwarfs and misreads as an outsized raise), or when their 2016 record is their very last on the Sunshine List — a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real change in pay until next year's data confirms it. This page does not list pay cuts: even the province-wide 2016 Sunshine List omits cuts for its own most recent year, since a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real cut until next year’s data arrives — that same reasoning applies to every employer, in every year, so cuts are left off this page entirely rather than showing them in some years and not others. Counts under five people show “<5”. Data runs through 2025.