Skip to content

What does a Procurement Advisor make at Regional Municipality of Peel?

In 2025 the median Procurement Advisor at Regional Municipality of Peel was paid $129,197, about 11% more than the provincial median of $116,899 for the role. The highest-paid was $140,149.

People

5

listed as Procurement Advisor in 2025

Median salary

$129,197

salary paid, 2025

Highest paid

$140,149

salary paid, 2025

vs Ontario

+$12,298

against $116,899 province-wide

Best paid in the role
Regional Municipality of Peel · 2025

#NameTitle as filedSalaryTotal
1Janice SmithAdvisor Procurement$140,149$140,548
2Gary GardenerAdvisor Procurement$132,707$133,104
3Mario MacglashanAdvisor Procurement$129,197$129,574
4Diane OliveiraAdvisor Procurement$118,037$118,284
5James BarnesAdvisor Procurement$111,410$111,756

The 5 highest salaries among the 5 Regional Municipality of Peel records mapped to Procurement Advisor in 2025. The full 2025 roster →

Median by year
20192025

  • At Regional Municipality of Peel
  • Ontario median for the role
At Regional Municipality of Peel and Ontario median for the role, 2019–2025At Regional Municipality of Peel: $115,090 in 2024 to $129,197 in 2025. Ontario median for the role: $106,606 in 2020 to $116,899 in 2025.$0$50K$100K$150K2019202120222025

Median salary paid, Procurement Advisor at Regional Municipality of Peel, against every Procurement Advisor in Ontario. Years with fewer than 5 people are left blank.

Year by year

Procurement Advisor at Regional Municipality of Peel by year
YearPeopleMedianHighestOntario median
20255$129,197$140,149$116,899
20245$115,090$124,250$111,703
2022<5<5<5
2021<5<5<5$110,334
2020<5<5<5$106,606
2019<5<5<5

Related questions

Method. Figures are salary paid (not salary plus taxable benefits), the basis of every median on this site, for records whose filed job title maps to Procurement Advisor at Regional Municipality of Peel on the Ontario Sunshine List, which lists only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more. A year with fewer than 5 people shows “<5” for both its count and its median, since naming the exact count would narrow the median down to specific people. Data runs through 2025.