What does a Senior Scientist make at Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories?
The 5 Senior Scientists at Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories had a median salary of $139,268 in 2025, about 31% under the provincial median of $202,257 for the role. The highest-paid was $145,000.
People
5listed as Senior Scientist in 2025
Median salary
$139,268salary paid, 2025
Highest paid
$145,000salary paid, 2025
vs Ontario
−$62,990against $202,257 province-wide
Best paid in the role
Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories · 2025
| # | Name | Title as filed | Salary | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Su-Peng Yu | Senior Scientist | $145,000 | $145,977 |
| 2 | Somayeh Mohammad Ali Mirzaee | Senior Scientist | $140,578 | $141,534 |
| 3 | Sanyasi Bobbara | Senior Scientist | $139,268 | $140,198 |
| 4 | Carola Purser | Senior Scientist | $133,098 | $133,986 |
| 5 | Pinrui Shen | Senior Scientist | $118,042 | $118,849 |
The 5 highest salaries among the 5 Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories records mapped to Senior Scientist in 2025. The full 2025 roster →
Median by year
2019–2025
- At Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories
- Ontario median for the role
Median salary paid, Senior Scientist at Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories, against every Senior Scientist in Ontario. Years with fewer than 5 people are left blank.
Year by year
Related questions
- What does a Senior Scientist make in Ontario? →
- What does a Senior Scientist make at Sunnybrook Research Institute? →
- What does a Senior Scientist make at Baycrest Academy for Research and Education? →
- How many Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories employees earn over $150,000? →
- Who makes the most at Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories? →
- Where does $139,268 rank in Ontario? →
Method. Figures are salary paid (not salary plus taxable benefits), the basis of every median on this site, for records whose filed job title maps to Senior Scientist at Quantum Valley Ideas Laboratories on the Ontario Sunshine List, which lists only public-sector employees paid $100,000 or more. A year with fewer than 5 people shows “<5” for both its count and its median, since naming the exact count would narrow the median down to specific people. Data runs through 2025.