Who got the biggest raise at Hamilton Health Sciences in 2002?

Hamilton Health Sciences's biggest raise in 2002 was JASIM RADHI's: $171,760 → $296,719, up 73%. 31 people got a raise between 2001 and 2002, with a median increase of 16%.

JASIM RADHI →

Biggest raise

+72.8%

JASIM RADHI

Got a raise

31

2001 → 2002

Median increase

+15.9%

among those who got one

On the list

87

2002 Sunshine List

Biggest raises
Hamilton Health Sciences · 2001 → 2002

JASIM RADHI+72.8%
Professor - Physician
$171,760 → $296,719
PETER POWERS+30.3%
Associate - Physician
$159,903 → $208,332
FRANCO DENARDI+25.2%
Associate - Physician
$171,760 → $215,027
CATHERINE ROSS+27.3%
Assistant - Physician
$153,056 → $194,873
LEELAMMA ELAVATHIL+22.4%
Associate - Physician
$171,760 → $210,227
FRANCESCA LOBO+21.0%
Associate - Physician
$171,760 → $207,827
JACQUELINE BOURGEOIS+24.1%
Assistant - Physician
$144,819 → $179,688
MATTHEW MCQUEEN+14.8%
Professor - Physician
$234,562 → $269,190
CATHERINE HAYWARD+19.6%
Associate - Physician
$163,690 → $195,827
MARK LOEB+19.6%
Associate - Physician
$161,422 → $193,096

27 joined Hamilton Health Sciences, 7 left Hamilton Health Sciences, in 2002. See the full 2002 roster →

Related questions

Method. Figures are salary paid, the same basis person_year_delta and the year page’s movers sections use. A mover is excluded from the raises above when their 2001 record was their first year at Hamilton Health Sciences (a partial year, such as a September hire, that a full second year then dwarfs and misreads as an outsized raise), or when their 2002 record is their very last on the Sunshine List — a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real change in pay until next year's data confirms it. This page does not list pay cuts: even the province-wide 2002 Sunshine List omits cuts for its own most recent year, since a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real cut until next year’s data arrives — that same reasoning applies to every employer, in every year, so cuts are left off this page entirely rather than showing them in some years and not others. Counts under five people show “<5”. Data runs through 2025.