Who got the biggest raise at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) in 2007?
ASTRID GUTTMANN took the biggest raise at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) in 2007: $129,995 to $155,298, up 19%. Across 5 people who got a raise that year, the median increase was 11%.
Biggest raise
+19.5%ASTRID GUTTMANN
Got a raise
52006 → 2007
Median increase
+10.9%among those who got one
On the list
112007 Sunshine List
Biggest raises
ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) · 2006 → 2007
<5 joined ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), <5 left ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), in 2007. See the full 2007 roster →
Related questions
- Who got the biggest raise at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) in 2025? →
- Who got the biggest raise at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) in 2024? →
- How many ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) employees earn over $150,000? →
- Who else got a raise on the 2007 Sunshine List? →
- ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) vs Municipal Property Assessment Corporation: who pays more? →
- Who makes the most in Other Public Sector Employers? →
Method. Figures are salary paid, the same basis person_year_delta and the year page’s movers sections use. A mover is excluded from the raises above when their 2006 record was their first year at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) (a partial year, such as a September hire, that a full second year then dwarfs and misreads as an outsized raise), or when their 2007 record is their very last on the Sunshine List — a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real change in pay until next year's data confirms it. This page does not list pay cuts: even the province-wide 2007 Sunshine List omits cuts for its own most recent year, since a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real cut until next year’s data arrives — that same reasoning applies to every employer, in every year, so cuts are left off this page entirely rather than showing them in some years and not others. Counts under five people show “<5”. Data runs through 2025.