Who got the biggest raise at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) in 2018?

Marian Vermeulen took the biggest raise at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) in 2018: $124,012 to $165,001, up 33%. Across 11 people who got a raise that year, the median increase was 3%.

Marian Vermeulen →

Biggest raise

+33.1%

Marian Vermeulen

Got a raise

11

2017 → 2018

Median increase

+2.5%

among those who got one

On the list

35

2018 Sunshine List

Biggest raises
ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) · 2017 → 2018

Marian Vermeulen+33.1%
Senior Director, Research and Data
$124,012 → $165,001
Rinku Sutradhar+13.6%
Program Leader/Senior Core Scientist
$166,816 → $189,488
Mahmoud Azimaee+8.8%
Director, Data Quality and Information Management
$107,443 → $116,856
Susan Bronskill+1.8%
Program Leader/Senior Core Scientist
$162,766 → $165,652
Jun Guan+2.5%
Research Methodologist
$112,132 → $114,936
Jiming Fang+2.5%
Research Methodologist
$112,132 → $114,936
Alexander Kopp+2.5%
Research Methodologist
$112,132 → $114,936
Refik Saskin+2.5%
Staff Scientist
$106,728 → $109,397
Ping Li+2.5%
Research Methodologist
$104,125 → $106,729
Ruth Croxford+2.2%
Research Methodologist
$115,636 → $118,159

13 joined ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), 9 left ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), in 2018. See the full 2018 roster →

Related questions

Method. Figures are salary paid, the same basis person_year_delta and the year page’s movers sections use. A mover is excluded from the raises above when their 2017 record was their first year at ICES (institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) (a partial year, such as a September hire, that a full second year then dwarfs and misreads as an outsized raise), or when their 2018 record is their very last on the Sunshine List — a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real change in pay until next year's data confirms it. This page does not list pay cuts: even the province-wide 2018 Sunshine List omits cuts for its own most recent year, since a partial final year before leaving looks identical to a real cut until next year’s data arrives — that same reasoning applies to every employer, in every year, so cuts are left off this page entirely rather than showing them in some years and not others. Counts under five people show “<5”. Data runs through 2025.